Welcome to the NEW RLFANS.COM. After twenty-five years of service, the old site expired over the last few days. To maintain service we have had no option but to make an early switch to the new site which was in development/testing. Some elements of the new site are unfinished, such as; page numbering and quotations. We will fix these minor issues as soon as we can, please bear with us. If you are having problems logging in, please try a different browser or platform, if problems persist then email support@rlfans.com
QuotePieman="Pieman"Edwards just a support player...classic
'"
Yeah you chose to overlook the point of the post which was comparing two completely different styles of player - I called Edwards a support player knowing there was more to his game than that & you called Myler the same seemingly ignoring the fact that he is more than that. Seems you don't really watch much rugby at the minute...
Quotemagic piano="magic piano"Yeah you chose to overlook the point of the post which was comparing two completely different styles of player - I called Edwards a support player knowing there was more to his game than that & you called Myler the same seemingly ignoring the fact that he is more than that. Seems you don't really watch much rugby at the minute...'"
You actually said Edwards was 'little more than a support player', which means there was little more to his game than that. The key is your use of the word little, which turns your sentence into a negative. Please don't ever get a job in diplomacy.
Quotemagic piano="magic piano"Yeah you chose to overlook the point of the post which was comparing two completely different styles of player - I called Edwards a support player knowing there was more to his game than that & you called Myler the same seemingly ignoring the fact that he is more than that. Seems you don't really watch much rugby at the minute...'"
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.