Personally I am not for a change. Sometimes steady progress builds a long term sustainable position rather than the short term glory that throwing cash at it does. Repaying the directors loans will have given them a cash income over the past few years (and is more tax efficient than drawing a salary or dividend) and the capital value of their shares will have risen on the back of an improved net worth. Our investment in youth and quality british players is a more sustainable investment than short term imports.



Would ownership of the club allow the rugby lease to be varied to our detriment? If Allams owned both clubs and the ground then they would hold all the cards - would it be cheaper to buy the club and do this rather than try and buy out the lease?



If it aint broken, dont fix it - and for me it isnt broken (save for the odd cup or two!).

Am I an idiot then?I go on Rovers site.

You're welcome

Yeah, and still more factual than you

Don't know do you go on and make meaningless posts ?



Must admit I've got better things to do than spend time on a fans forum of a club I don't support, but each to their own.