|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f24f/9f24f36fa6e017b7a8f4d502a857ead486652cf7" alt="" |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 6096 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2015 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote stormingbronco="stormingbronco"Very touching lot of posts. Stop trying to defend your Club and/or saying your the only Club which meets the SL requirements. It's an independent group within the RFL who will decide if Widnes is a suitable club for promotion and your posts are of no help towards this result.
Personally I have no view on your application except to say would prefer Toulouse get the nod.'"
Thas, bye now data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0590/b0590e7f28ffda2e17449c022bf912584f5e2308" alt="WAVE icon_wave.gif"
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 33944 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Maximus Decimus="Maximus Decimus":ft8w9mybHere's the point, they come across that way if you're looking at.
=#FF0000:ft8w9mybThe fact is that Widnes are only really ever spoken about by other clubs when we're being attacked and undermined:ft8w9myb. The reason we are being attacked is because we are clear favourites to be promoted. Of course Widnes fans will get defensive, especially when the attacks are so ignorant of the reality of the situation. We get criticised for playing to the rules that the RFL stated. We get criticised for our on the field performance when we spent up to the cap as did many other teams whilst trying to being youth through instead of higher profile players. We also seem to get the brunt of the anti-RFL anti-licensing crowd.
So you're often reading Widnes fans defending themselves against fans of other clubs. You class this as arrogant but I wouldn't.'" financial figures you have posted
The vast majority of fans , even those that have questioned those 2 subjects have admiited you should get a SL spot on merit
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 1557 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2013 | Mar 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote stormingbronco="stormingbronco"Very touching lot of posts. Stop trying to defend your Club and/or saying your the only Club which meets the SL requirements. It's an independent group within the RFL who will decide if Widnes is a suitable club for promotion and your posts are of no help towards this result.
Personally I have no view on your application except to say would prefer Toulouse get the nod.'"
What a pointless post.
There's nothing worse than somebody who doesn't see the point in forums yet comes on one to say so.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 1557 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2013 | Mar 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Starbug="Starbug"I'd very much disagree with that
90 % of the posts about widnes tend to be stating the obvious , that you are the club that should should get a SL spot and you shpould have got one last time
However some recent post have come about because of your ' relatively ' poor show on the pitch this season [ however given the very competitive nature of the Championship from 2 nd to 9th , it is hardly surprising , and because of the quite incredible [ by sporting club standards financial figures you have posted
The vast majority of fans , even those that have questioned those 2 subjects have admiited you should get a SL spot on merit'"
What I was saying was the only time fans of other clubs generally come across Widnes is on a franchising/licensing thread. These often descend into arguments between those that think Widnes should get a license and those that don't.
The bit in bold is the reason why it happens so often. Too often people come up with the simplistic argument that Widnes shouldn't get a spot because we have finished 5th and the winners should go up. This then leads to Widnes fans (and others) putting them straight because it's a nonsense argument. Whether you support P&R or not, we haven't had P&R in place so you can't criticise Widnes for playing the game.
The bit in bold is the reason it rankles most. The cap is lowered so that teams can compete with Widnes and create the fantastically competitive league that we have now. Yet the fact that Widnes cannot dominate the league under this cap for some reason makes people think that we shouldn't go up at the expense of other clubs that score much poorer everywhere else.
Widnes fans aren't arrogant in the slightest, or no more so than any other clubs. However when your constantly defending yourselves against stupid claims like those, it could easily appear arrogant. If there were no stupid claims there would be no 'arrogance.'
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 16250 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 123 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2011 | Mar 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Maximus Decimus="Maximus Decimus"What I was saying was the only time fans of other clubs generally come across Widnes is on a franchising/licensing thread. These often descend into arguments between those that think Widnes should get a license and those that don't.
The bit in bold is the reason why it happens so often. Too often people come up with the simplistic argument that Widnes shouldn't get a spot because we have finished 5th and the winners should go up. This then leads to Widnes fans (and others) putting them straight because it's a nonsense argument. Whether you support P&R or not, we haven't had P&R in place so you can't criticise Widnes for playing the game.
The bit in bold is the reason it rankles most. The cap is lowered so that teams can compete with Widnes and create the fantastically competitive league that we have now. Yet the fact that Widnes cannot dominate the league under this cap for some reason makes people think that we shouldn't go up at the expense of other clubs that score much poorer everywhere else.
Widnes fans aren't arrogant in the slightest, or no more so than any other clubs. However when your constantly defending yourselves against stupid claims like those, it could easily appear arrogant. If there were no stupid claims there would be no 'arrogance.''"
I may be wrong here but didn't Widnes post £1 million loss last year? So with their "£1 million profit" this year would cancel out last years losses. I think you will find the cap was lowered to support clubs in general NOT to ALLOW them to keep up with a club that until this year (accounts still to be posted) has just come out of administration and seemingly posted profits.
As I said I may be wrong..... data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d1b1/0d1b163ff8c197d1ed702dca9735636ea100c7ee" alt="Very Happy icon_biggrin.gif"
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 6096 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2015 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote soss="soss"I may be wrong here but didn't Widnes post £1 million loss last year? So with their "£1 million profit" this year would cancel out last years losses. I think you will find the cap was lowered to support clubs in general NOT to ALLOW them to keep up with a club that until this year (accounts still to be posted) has just come out of administration and seemingly posted profits.
As I said I may be wrong.....
'"
Slightly wrong as accounts are dated a further year back so the 1 mill profit was the year of 400k cap! Plus the million loss was club updates if you like... Well worth it too in SO'Cs opinion!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5870 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2016 | Aug 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote soss="soss"I may be wrong here but didn't Widnes post £1 million loss last year? So with their "£1 million profit" this year would cancel out last years losses. I think you will find the cap was lowered to support clubs in general NOT to ALLOW them to keep up with a club that until this year (accounts still to be posted) has just come out of administration and seemingly posted profits.
As I said I may be wrong.....
'"
The £1million loss was entirely down to spending on infrastructure. If SOC hadn’t done that we probably wouldn’t have made a loss.
We were always going to be in a better position this season, and from then on. Our support would see us being able to better anyone in this league financially. If that was allowed to be fully utilized against our competitors, it would make it very difficult for the other clubs.
I’m not saying that it would guarantee complete domination – team sport doesn’t necessarily work that way, you still need a coach who knows what he’s doing – but we wouldn’t be sitting in 5th place, and I doubt Batley would have won the NRC. The £300k cap has had a massive impact already. It’s made the league far more competitive and lowered the ability of wealthier clubs to bring their financial clout into play. The cap is more realistic in SL and the wealthier clubs still have this advantage over the smaller clubs.
We went into admistration 3-years ago (2007), so would have had no baring at all on the decision to lower the cap.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 123 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2011 | Mar 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Pepe="Pepe"The £1million loss was entirely down to spending on infrastructure. If SOC hadn’t done that we probably wouldn’t have made a loss.
We were always going to be in a better position this season, and from then on. Our support would see us being able to better anyone in this league financially. If that was allowed to be fully utilized against our competitors, it would make it very difficult for the other clubs.
I’m not saying that it would guarantee complete domination – team sport doesn’t necessarily work that way, you still need a coach who knows what he’s doing – but we wouldn’t be sitting in 5th place, and I doubt Batley would have won the NRC. The £300k cap has had a massive impact already. It’s made the league far more competitive and lowered the ability of wealthier clubs to bring their financial clout into play. The cap is more realistic in SL and the wealthier clubs still have this advantage over the smaller clubs.
We went into admistration 3-years ago (2007), so would have had no baring at all on the decision to lower the cap.'"
I didnt say that administration did have a bareing on the cap. What I said was you came out in 2007. It doesnt matter where the money is spent for the books its the fact is was spent and posted as a loss (has to come from somewhere). I don't want to get into this side of it as I dont know your accounts other than what I have read on the forum.
The point I was making is that the cap did not come in to rein Widnes back it was brought in to stop clubs overspending and going into administration. No team can use the salary cap as an excuse for their performance as we ALL work to the same capping system which is audited by the RFL.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 256 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2013 | Apr 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote stormingbronco="stormingbronco"Very touching lot of posts. Stop trying to defend your Club and/or saying your the only Club which meets the SL requirements. It's an independent group within the RFL who will decide if Widnes is a suitable club for promotion and your posts are of no help towards this result.
Personally I have no view on your application except to say would prefer Toulouse get the nod.'"
Toulouse CANNOT APPLY so they can't get the nod unlucky!!!!!!! next.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 33944 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote A.N.Other Viking="A.N.Other Viking"Toulouse CANNOT APPLY so they can't get the nod unlucky!!!!!!! next.'"
Yes they can , but they cannot get ' your ' spot data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbfa5/bbfa5fc2059ec2d9f2e4b15ea06c1f7fd6936a17" alt="Wink icon_wink.gif"
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 256 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2013 | Apr 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Starbug="Starbug"Yes they can , but they cannot get ' your ' spot
'"
[size=150No, Toulouse do not meet the minimum criteria and will not be able to apply.[/size
That is a quote from an e-mail sent from the RFL to a Widnes fan regarding franchises.
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f24f/9f24f36fa6e017b7a8f4d502a857ead486652cf7" alt="" |
|