The Budget 2012 : Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:14 pm  

Well, off we go.
"From 2014 taxpayers will receive personal statements, detailing what they have paid and where the money is going."

WTF? He can actually specify where MY tax is going? Wow. Give me a say, Georgie and we may be talking.

And this pointless wheeze will waste how much money he hasn't got?

Re: The Budget 2012 : Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:27 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Well, off we go.
"From 2014 taxpayers will receive personal statements, detailing what they have paid and where the money is going."

WTF? He can actually specify where MY tax is going? Wow. Give me a say, Georgie and we may be talking.

And this pointless wheeze will waste how much money he hasn't got?

Depends how the data is delivered - e-mails are pretty cheap? Just rehash the P60 data into some presentable format and combine it with existing government spending data - simple.

If its printed virtually the whole cost will end up back in the government's coffers one way or another.

Re: The Budget 2012 : Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:30 pm  

It will be by email, and it will be automatically generated using a simple formula based around how much tax you paid, and what money has been spent by the government, and what proportion of the total tax revenue has been paid by you personally.

Pointless yes, but expensive? Not really.

Its a nothing story which, I rather fancy would be a "wonderful initiative" if the Labour Party had thought of it.

Re: The Budget 2012 : Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:41 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Well, off we go.
"From 2014 taxpayers will receive personal statements, detailing what they have paid and where the money is going."

WTF? He can actually specify where MY tax is going? Wow. Give me a say, Georgie and we may be talking.

And this pointless wheeze will waste how much money he hasn't got?

Old news. Examples were shown on DM website yesterday / day before.

Re: The Budget 2012 : Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:41 pm  

Congratulations George on producing the most fundamentally flawed analysis of the impact of the 50p tax rate.

Apparently it didn't raise as much as was expected, because a lot of people took additional income in the preceding year to avoid it. So rather than waiting until we see what it produces this year (the first year that won't be available as an option to additional rate taxpayers) we're going to get rid of it.

Except we're not going to actually get rid of it, we're going to reduce it so it's only 5p different to the higher rate of income tax. I'm sure that will bring all those departed oligarchs and business leaders that fled the country rushing back.

Perhaps the money raised (five times the current income, apparently) can all be used to set up and run this new means testing system for child benefit?

Re: The Budget 2012 : Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:45 pm  

I have mixed feelings about the tax statement issue, yes it will be interesting to read where the money goes and the similar one that we get from our local council every year is welcome.

On the other hand my sceptical self is of the opinion that this information is another attempt to deflect blame for budget cuts to those most vulnerable, why else would you highlight the amount spent on benefits if not to justify your budget attacks on those on benefits ?

And after all that you have to ask the question, if government are not there to provide health care and financial support to the weaker in society, then just what are they there for ?

Re: The Budget 2012 : Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:48 pm  

just ct through all the cack.

how much has fags and diesel gone up, and have they brought back gambling tax?

Re: The Budget 2012 : Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:50 pm  

Live Wired wrote:

just ct through all the cack.

how much has fags and diesel gone up, and have they brought back gambling tax?

fags up by 37p

nothing on diesel

no to the gambling tax

Re: The Budget 2012 : Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:52 pm  

ROBINSON wrote:

It will be by email, and it will be automatically generated using a simple formula based around how much tax you paid, and what money has been spent by the government, and what proportion of the total tax revenue has been paid by you personally.

Pointless yes, but expensive? Not really.

Its a nothing story which, I rather fancy would be a "wonderful initiative" if the Labour Party had thought of it.

No. I've checked. It would have been equally pointless if the Labour Party had thought of it. It would only be a "wonderful initiative" in that strange binary world you appear to occupy where everyone is either Tory or Labour, and they slavishly, uncritically support everything that party does. I've not seen any evidence for that on here.

This seems to be a sop to the Taxpayer's Alliance, so they can point to money spent on the 'undeserving poor'.

Re: The Budget 2012 : Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:54 pm  

ahh well, may aswell start buying the dodgy £4/pack from the pub.

Did anyone else notice petrol stations putting a penny on a litre last night?