: Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:04 pm
I can't really see why Bell's in there. He was deservedly dropped a while back and hasn't done enough to get back in ahead of any of the incumbent top 5 IMO.
I thought Harmison might get in on the logic of picking someone the Aussies might not fancy facing. (He's clearly a different bowler in this country to overseas, notwithstanding his spectacular series in the West Indies in 2003/4.) I also thought Sidebottom as well as Harmison might have edged ahead of Onions in the selectors' thinking, athough I like his wholehearted and aggressive approach and on current form deserved to keep his place.
Giving a young spinner his debut in a series like this would have been an adventurous choice so I'm not surprised Rashid has lost out to Panesar, although as Swann is clearly first choice it would have been less of a gamble to go with Rashid in the event of playing two spinners. Rashid's far superior batting might also have been useful, and as he would only have played in the event of a fourth seamer (i.e. Onions) being omitted we wouldn't have had two bowlers with only a couple of Tests between them in the side.
It looks like Monty took a few wickets just in time in the warm up game at Edgbaston. (Although the same logic doesn't apply to Harmison?)